R v Nedelkof, [1998] O.J. No. 4493 – (Thomas – GenDiv):

[8] It is my respectful view that the trial judge maintained jurisdiction over the alleged offences and the defendant because he was clearly satisfied that an information was in existence although it was not physically present in the courtroom for part of the trial proper: See R. v. Frank Veltri and Veltri Stamping Co. Ltd., [1986] O.J. No. 894, (1986), 3 W.C.B. (2d) 88 (Ont. C.A.).