R v Sundman, 2018 BCSC 2037 (Williams):

[54] It seems to me that, where an interview subject elects to provide information to the interviewer denying any responsibility, it is not unreasonable to expect that the interviewer could represent to the interviewee that, if what he says is so, that would impact the proceedings going forward. In my respectful view, that is a natural consequence of the tack that the interview subject, in this case Mr. Martin, elects to follow.

[55] I do not see that as constituting a misrepresentation or some form of trick to cause Mr. Martin to speak.