R v Sundman, 2018 BCSC 2037 (Williams): [54] It seems to me that, where an interview subject elects to provide information to the interviewer denying any responsibility, it is not unreasonable to expect that the interviewer could represent to the interviewee that, if what he says is so, that would impact the proceedings going forward. In my respectful view, that Read more...
R v Sundman, 2018 BCSC 2037 (Williams): [57] As the interview progressed, Mr. Martin continued to give the versions of events that were not consistent with what the police investigation had discovered. Cpl. O’Ruairc elected not to confront or challenge Mr. Martin on those points, but rather he simply continued to move forward, giving him encouragement when he made further Read more...
R v Reis – 2019 ONCA 168 (Per Curiam): [18] The KGB statement was properly admitted for the truth of its contents. The trial judge accepted that Gray’s trial evidence was not an outright recantation of the statement, and was entitled to determine what weight to give to his evidence. His decision reveals no error, nor did the trial judge Read more...